Thank you all. You've given us a lot of testimony. You've given us a lot of food for thought. Considering that this law was written in 2007, and we are doing a first review, and considering that it's not probably feasible to rewrite the whole thing, there must be some low-hanging fruit that we can capitalize on. For example, Mr. Devine, you said that the Canadian law is a paper shield and not a metal shield. How would you make it a metal shield?
We heard about the gag orders. We heard about the “good faith” clause being removed. What else would you do to make it a metal shield?