You say it's “working as it was intended.”
I was wondering whether that was a Freudian slip. One of our experts on Monday evening said he felt that this act was created to protect senior bureaucrats and ministers. I am saying this in good faith, Ms. Smart.
You say that it works
“as it was intended.”
However, according to those experts, it protects
high wrongdoers.
Your analysis of the act is very different from what the experts we heard from said about it. They don't agree with that conclusion.