You wouldn't see any real difference between having the standard of having to show that someone breached their duty to protect and support the employee versus having to prove that there was a reprisal? That wouldn't make any difference? We heard in evidence earlier this week that the lower standard was more protective of whistle-blowers, the lower standard of someone failing to meet up to their duty to protect and support, versus having to prove reprisal, which is almost never done.
On March 23rd, 2017. See this statement in context.