Well, we certainly saw it in the MD Charlton case before the tribunal. The tribunal agreed that there were issues with the solicitation. But just on a broader level, I do. This idea of the blanket NSEs and running multiple solicitations under the NSEs and Canada's historical position and Canada's position in the HP decision as well that no justification is necessary is, to me, contrary to the trade agreements. The NSE language in the trade agreements has qualifiers showing that Canada considers it necessary. To me, you have to give some effect to that language. There has to be some ability to test whether or not Canada actually felt it was necessary or whether Canada was using an NSE as a convenient way to avoid going through its other obligations in order to justify sole-sourcing, for example. I think the tribunal is going in that direction certainly.
On May 2nd, 2017. See this statement in context.