I agree in part. Ideally, the approval process should be program by program, as the government previously asked. It is easier, for example, to examine one program and the corresponding amount, then another, and so on. High-level expenditures, such as statutory spending, budgetary spending or other kinds such as salaries, will now be based on the same objectives. That will certainly give you information of another kind, but there is still a large grey area where you will not have all the details of all the programs.
The argument is that you are going to go from 300 or 240 votes to 1,200. That argument is still valid. I reread this committee's 2012 report and the response to its members at that time used exactly the same argument. The officials said that it would not possible to have an approval process program by program, because that would require too many votes.