Well, relative to the current system, I think anything would be an improvement. There is a performance architecture within the government. They are always trying to improve that. What we have observed in the past is that the way that was managed and the information that was provided was not very useful. We did a study a couple of years ago, in which we looked at the performance indicators. We tried to figure out how they are being used, and whether there is any link between those performance indicators and the changes in expenditures for various programs. We couldn't find any link between those two. We saw that programs that were not actually performing well were given more money, and programs that were performing really well saw their budget reduced.
So it wasn't really clear how the government was using the indicators. Right now they are trying to improve that, and we have to see if it is a better system. Certainly that would be welcome.