Evidence of meeting #10 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 43rd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was employees.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jean-Yves Duclos  President of the Treasury Board
Kathleen Owens  Assistant Comptroller General, Acquired Services and Assets Sector, Office of the Comptroller General, Treasury Board Secretariat
Nancy Chahwan  Chief Human Resources Officer, Treasury Board Secretariat
Francis Bilodeau  Acting Chief Information Officer of Canada, Treasury Board Secretariat
Eddy Bourque  National President, Canada Employment and Immigration Union
Chris Aylward  National President, Public Service Alliance of Canada
Sharleen Stewart  President, Service Employees International Union Healthcare
Marc Brière  National President, Union of Taxation Employees
Raphaëlle Deraspe  Committee Researcher
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Paul Cardegna

1 p.m.

The Clerk

There's nothing that obliges a witness to make an opening statement. However, our previous practice of taking an opening statement and appending it to the evidence unfortunately requires a motion of the committee to do so. The committee isn't empowered to entertain this motion, pursuant to the order adopted by the House, so we find ourselves in a unique situation.

Also, the speaking notes we got today for the witnesses in the second half we received anytime from last night to this morning. There was simply not enough time for us to translate them, to be able to distribute them to members ahead of time.

These are some of the reasons for having witnesses deliver their opening statements before the committee. For the broader public to hear the comments of the witnesses is one of the reasons we've been doing that. I do understand the frustration members are having. We are hoping that we can regulate the technical issues soon.

1:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Tom Lukiwski

Mr. Green, I think you had some comments.

1:05 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

I did. Thank you.

I can appreciate members of the public who come in as experts and have their six minutes. What I'm having a difficult challenge with, though, is ministers who come in with a one-hour time limit, regurgitate what amounts to a press release, and then have their staff fumble around reanswering questions that have already been answered.

If I can share this with you, I don't ever want to have to publicly interject with staff or cut people off. I don't like being put in a situation of having to do that, recognizing as the fourth party that all this time that's been used up affects my round and that I'm going to get bumped out. We've even seen members of the governing party and other folks get bumped out because of the fumbling that's happening here. If there's a motion or some way we can forgo or perhaps post the opening statements, or if they can be put out in a media release, I'd be happy with that. On the record, I don't want to get frustrated with having to interject because I'm not getting my time.

1:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Tom Lukiwski

Thank you, Matthew.

Before I go to Kelly Block—and correct me if I'm wrong, Paul—I suppose that if ministers are appearing, we would be able to contact them prior to their appearance and let them know that the committee would appreciate it if they could go directly to questions and somehow have their statements available but not read into the record.

1:05 p.m.

The Clerk

If we have their statements available, we could consider it as a brief and post it on the committee's website. Then you could ask the ministers to go directly to questions if you want. That is an option.

1:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Tom Lukiwski

We'll go to Kelly Block first.

1:05 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly Block Conservative Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek, SK

Really quickly, Tom, I think that's an excellent suggestion. If we don't do that, then we should at least ask them to choose a language to give their statement in so that we don't have the fiasco we had today.

1:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Tom Lukiwski

As you know, that's why I interjected halfway through, Kelly, and asked if a question started en français to complete it, and the same thing in English, so we didn't have to worry about spending precious seconds trying to wait for the interpretation to catch up.

Colleagues, that takes us back to Raphaëlle's presentation. We have the list of witnesses. I've heard no one else suggest that we add or delete any of the witnesses suggested, so are we comfortable with going forward with the work plan and the witnesses who have been proposed?

Paul, do we need a recorded vote for this?

1:05 p.m.

The Clerk

I think Madame Vignola would like to intervene, Mr. Chair.

1:05 p.m.

Liberal

Francis Drouin Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON

I would too, after that.

1:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Tom Lukiwski

Yes, it's Julie first and then Francis.

1:05 p.m.

Bloc

Julie Vignola Bloc Beauport—Limoilou, QC

I'd like to make a suggestion.

Often, when time is short and we start another five-minute round, Mr. Green and I do not get a second turn. If there doesn't seem to be enough time for everyone to have a turn, could we go to three minutes? That way, we could each have a little bit of time.

1:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Tom Lukiwski

Yes, Madame Vignola, you're quite correct. The committee has the ability to set whatever time frame we want. I have arbitrarily done that on a few occasions and cut the times off from six to five to four minutes in an attempt to get as many questions in as possible.

I will take that under consideration, and going forward if it looks as though we're not going to be able to get two complete rounds or the third round in, I will propose that we cut down the time allotted to see if that meets the concurrence and the agreement of committee members.

Francis, I think we have you up next.

1:10 p.m.

Liberal

Francis Drouin Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON

I just have a question with regard to one particular witness, and that's Amazon. I know we had all submitted our lists before, but there has been some clarity provided with regard to the role that Amazon is playing, and I would just ask if it's still the will of Mr. Green to propose that particular witness.

1:10 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

It is absolutely, 100%.

1:10 p.m.

Liberal

Francis Drouin Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON

Okay, so you want the same answer?

1:10 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

No, I want them in front of our committee. That is what I want, Frank.

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Tom Lukiwski

Raphaëlle, having heard that, can I entrust you to try to make sure we incorporate a representative from Amazon to appear at the appropriate time?

1:10 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Raphaëlle Deraspe

Yes, it is already included, Mr. Chair.

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Tom Lukiwski

Thank you very much.

Are there any other questions or comments? We are running a little over time, and our technicians do have to leave to start setting up another meeting.

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

Just really quickly, when can we get the updated schedule?

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Tom Lukiwski

The schedule is already out for next week.

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

Sorry, Tom. I mean the updated witness list, not the meeting schedule.

1:10 p.m.

The Clerk

If I may, Mr. Chair, we hope to publish a notice of meeting today. If not, we will publish one on the weekend.

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

Thank you.