The key aspect of your question is, do we continue engaging with China? I say, absolutely we need to continue to engage with China. As you mentioned, it is one-sixth of the population. If we're going to deal with global climate change or the next global pandemic, or if we're going to deal with North Korean denuclearization or the militarization of the East China Sea and South China Sea, we have to discuss things with the Chinese. We have to create crosswalks in terms of policy discussions and we have to develop a better understanding of what's happening within the party and what's happening within the country. To not do so would put Canada and other middle powers at great risk.
The question is, which I think goes to Mr. Genuis' discussion, what's the best way to engage in China? Going back to my initial comments, we need to do it collectively; we need to work with like-minded countries; and we need to have a strong, rules-based approach that is backed up by the United States. This goes back to one of my key points, that we need to pull the United States back from an America-first point of view.