Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to the witnesses for appearing.
My colleague briefly touched on it. When the Red Tape Reduction Act was implemented, there was the one-for-one rule. We know that other jurisdictions have implemented two-for-one.
Is there a reason we wouldn't choose to go for the two-for-one rule? What would be the advantages and disadvantages of staying with the one-for-one rule, and what have we learned from the one-for-one rule versus perhaps going for the two-for-one rule?