In the table you provided on page 5 of the report, it states the breakdown of the one-for-one rule, the implementation of the one-for-one rule, over the last number of years, from 2012 to 2019. It indicates, for example, that in 2017-18, we had 86 regulations that were eliminated. This represents a significant spike over the number of regulations that were eliminated in the previous years. It only amounted to a reduction in the net administrative burden of about $71,000.
Can you speak to the fact that in that one year you had the largest number of regulations that were eliminated, but you had the smallest amount of impact in terms of cost?