Yes, absolutely, but I come back to my skepticism about the ability of the federal bureaucracy—and I'm a former federal bureaucrat—to do this on its own even with the best will in the world. The government is capable of that kind of smart connected operation for only a limited period of time on an issue as complex as China.
I mentioned the Manley panel on Afghanistan because it was the recommendation of people like John Manley, Derek Burney and Paul Tellier that government reorganize itself for special challenges and that these challenges needed to be led by the Prime Minister. I think we would need at least that level of organization around China so that every senior official in the federal government would be aware of the fact that if China is involved in whatever issue they're dealing with, they need to stop. They need to think and they need to consult. Until that happens, I'm afraid that we won't get there. We won't get there by working from the bottom up. This has to come from the top down, because it's a significant change in how government operates. You saw the results of that at your last meeting, that we didn't need Deloitte, an expensive consulting company, to tell us that the government needs to co-operate, but it won't happen without high-level leadership.