I'm a bit concerned. I'm not sure whether you're just being nice here, but “might have”, “could have”.... When we're talking about taxpayers' money, should the approach not be a bit more aggressive than to say, there “might be” some fraud, we “might” or “should” look at it, or we “could look at it”, as opposed to “the government definitely should take a look at this”?
On April 26th, 2021. See this statement in context.