Paragraph 6.27 of your report on page 7 says that “the department considered social, economic, and health and safety” info to design the program, referring to CERB. I'm wondering how you came up with that—“the department considered social, economic and health and safety”—because one of the items that came out of the CERB was two-thirds of a billion dollars being paid to 15-year-olds and 16-year-olds living at home.
I'm trying to figure out what social and economic design went into a program to pay 15-year-olds and 16-year-olds two-thirds of a billion dollars, when perhaps that money could have been used for long-term care centres or procuring more vaccines or probably for other areas needing resources.