No, I understand it's not your intent, but it does appear otherwise.
On page 78 you quoted cabinet confidence, blocking out the part on incremental costs of power and cooling. How is that cabinet confidence? This is not a Treasury Board submission with costs. I would understand that as cabinet confidence. This is not a Treasury Board submission. This is not even an RFI. It's just a ballpark cost from a consultant. I'm trying to wrap my head around, again, how this is cabinet confidence.