Okay. I just want to ask you a question, just switching track, about Cisco and about the amount of sole sourcing. You mentioned that, out of $1.3 billion of procurement, 87% is competitively bid. You continued, though, and you talked about name branding. If your department specifies it has to be a Cisco brand, but then goes to competitive bids on who's delivering the Cisco-branded product, is that not a form of sole sourcing? Is that included in that 13%?
You're not forcing, but when you're basically directing to use a Cisco product and going to vendors to deliver it, do you consider that a competitive bid?