I'll accept that, and I'll look for whatever you have in writing.
In your cover letter, Mr. Glover, you stated that you:
...recognize the text of the motion and the privilege enjoyed by members of the House of Commons, and for this reason, should the Chair feel that it remains important to access an unredacted version, we [could] be open to discussing the circumstances under which the confidentiality of [the] sensitive information can be assured.
Given that, how could committee members gain access to unredacted versions of this report, and what are the risks associated with releasing this report unredacted to the public? I guess my third question is this. Understanding that statement, why wouldn't you just have provided it to us under those circumstances to begin with?