I want to follow up on my colleague Mr. Paul-Hus' comments.
We think that it's important to understand that we want to move on to a discussion on the development of the committee's work. If we must continually receive and debate motions and conduct new studies, we'll never be able to study everything. We have a very long list of proposals, which have been adopted or which still need to be debated, to guide the committee's work.
I think that the chair, the government party and the opposition want us to have a reasonable discussion on what could constitute the committee's schedule and workload. However, if we must start each meeting with a new study proposal, which we'll be asked to debate, adopt and put on the schedule, obviously we'll never be able to begin the work that we were sent here to do.