Yes, it appears twice.
Procedurally, when a committee adjourns debate on a motion, the motion remains before the committee, and the committee can take up the debate again at any time; however, it rests with the committee to determine when it wants to do that.
In this case, the chair recognized that Mr. Paul-Hus moved his motion. There is nothing that prevents another member from moving that we resume consideration of Mr. Green's motion. That being said, we wouldn't be resuming consideration of Mr. Green's motion; we would be resuming debate on the totality of it, which is to say the motion and the amendment that Mr. MacKinnon has moved.
At this point, it depends on how the committee wishes to proceed. If the committee wishes to continue with Mr. Green's motion, it only needs somebody to move that, and the committee will take the majority decision on that. Alternatively, Mr. Paul-Hus was recognized and moved a motion that is on the floor.