Just to be clear, you're defining affordability as what we called inclusionary zoning, which is that just 30% of the units must have affordable options, so 70% are at profit. Could you provide us with an insight on just who these properties are being transferred to? Are they transferred to non-profits or to development companies that are then providing, within inclusionary zoning, an earmark of 30% affordability, that is, 30% of the units being affordable?
