As I said, we looked at a fraction of the contracts. We looked at 39 because we were targeting contracts that included one of the personal protective equipments that we scoped in. While the process wasn't perfect—because we had recommendations—I believe that some of the risks they took were reasonable in the context of securing personal protective equipment in a market where supply was not often keeping up with the demand. The country needed to get to the table to get personal protective equipment. In those circumstances, it was a reasonable approach.
On June 7th, 2021. See this statement in context.