It does, and I appreciate that. We're trying to get to a place here where, hopefully, people can have the ability to express any kind of dissenting opinions on policy that might protect people.
I have a question for Ms. Mullen that's a bit of a shot in the dark.
In 2014, there was a presentation called “IP Profiling Analytics & Mission Impacts”, which tracked the cellphones of travellers passing through Toronto Pearson Airport. Was anything learned from that that we might apply to potential risks that could have come through malicious technologies that could have been placed in our own equipment, in our own missions?