Absolutely, Mr. Chair.
What I'll say is that the amendment by my colleague MP Housefather encapsulates the spirit of Madam Vignola's motion. I think the spirit of the motion, which I think is supported by everybody around this table, is that ideally we would want to see made-in-Canada PPE procured. But at the same time, it doesn't establish a fact or use the language of fact. When no fact has been brought forward or been established at all, what are we working from as a committee?
I would implore committee members to adopt MP Housefather's amendment, because it captures the spirit of what we're trying to accomplish here. We want to promote Canadian-made PPEs and support Canadian-made companies, but it doesn't state that we established as fact something that has not been established as fact, because we haven't had the opportunity to actually have that discussion here.
That's what I would bring forward. That's why I would support the amendment put forward by MP Housefather.