Right.
You'll notice that there is a section of the report that deals specifically with value for money. It does speak to the bands questions that we were being asked. We kind of focused in this review on looking at value for money.
That's where the 76% comes in. Did we receive value in terms of the resources that we wanted to allocate? Also, when we were looking at the price component, did we receive the best pricing possible?
I think there were some structural elements here that didn't lead us to get the best result from a procurement standpoint.