That's a recommendation clearly that this government did not listen to and attempt to fix.
My last question is on GC Strategies, which won a $25.3 million contract in May 2022. Is it correct that GC Strategies was the only one that could win the contract because the mandatory criteria required the winning bidder to have worked on three contracts the CBSA had previously sole-sourced to GC Strategies, and can this contract still be considered to be competitive when the criteria are so restrictive?