That's exactly what I wanted to say, with a little bit of a caveat. Remember that we're going to have the minister here twice before we actually start this study, on both the main estimates and other things. Once we get to a point where we have a pretty good understanding of what the issues are and what the challenges are and what the strategies are, I think that would be an appropriate time for us to call the minister to come in. Then we could clearly say that this is what we heard; we understand that these are the challenges, and we also understand that these other recommendations have been made to him, for example, and we could ask what the government is going to do. That's rather than coming in right off the bat and probably setting the direction that we are assessing it, evaluating it and looking at it. That will be the latter part of the process, definitely. As for the other part, that's already covered. We could call other witnesses, including the minister. The minister would fall under “other witnesses”.
I'm saying that before we get this study done—even to the last meeting, at which we were going to call the minister—we're going to have opportunities to call the minister. Whether we're going to go to an extra round of 25 minutes every time we have a minister coming in and talk specifically about Canada Post, I'm not 100% sure, but I can tell you that during those hours when the minister and staff and the department show up here, we will have an opportunity to ask any questions we want, and we've done that in the past.
Thank you.