Thank you, Mr. Chair.
That's the best pivot I've ever seen. I commend my colleague Mr. Brock for doing such a great pivot and talking about and linking it to ArriveCAN. That's the scope of this study, but it doesn't have anything to do with why we have this witness called here. Linking it somehow to the federal government and to the Prime Minister and all those things is a great pivot. I hope, really, that the media is watching and that Canadians are watching, because they can see what this supposed ArriveCAN study is all about.
Now, I am specifically asking, and our side is specifically supporting asking, the committee to excuse Mr. Lafleur. My belief, and the belief on our side, is that if we actually continue with this, we are justifying what happened in the last meeting and the process we went through. The approach we took was wrong. By having this meeting today, by putting Mr. Lafleur through process questions, and by continuing along the line of some of the comments we got from Mr. Brock, which are directly from this report.... I wanted to know which part. It is actually on page 5 of 71 of the report.
This is not right. Until this study is done, we cannot talk about the fact that potentially some of the witnesses have chosen not to speak or participate in an investigation.
You just revealed that, sir. You just revealed that.