It is what it is. We're not going to change what's already happened. We have to move forward.
I think, given that some members of the committee are talking about the statement of fact and reading from it, it would be beneficial to have the whole thing in front of everybody. I have no way of knowing whether it compromises the investigation, because I haven't seen it, but it would seem that putting out portions of it and not the statement in its entirety is not to the benefit of transparency and accountability.
I'll leave it at that. It sounds like we're going to have that conversation. Potentially, we'll have Mr. Lafleur back at a future date once we have the statement in front of us.
We are running out of time in this meeting, and I had hoped to bring forward my motion, so if I may, Mr. Chair, I'll take this moment to thank Mr. Lafleur for his time with us today and to move my motion, which has been put on notice, that the committee undertake a study on the loss of postal service in Canada's rural and remote—