Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, Ms. Hogan and your colleagues, for joining us here today.
I know you've had a very busy week. I'm not sure it's going to get less busy as a result of the very scathing report you tabled on Monday.
In that report, you found there was no evidence of contact between CBSA and GC Strategies to solicit a bid for the initial ArriveCAN contract. However, you did note—and this would have been in sections 1.38 and 1.39 on page 10—that one bid had been submitted by a company other than GC Strategies.
We have heard testimony at this committee that two options for ArriveCAN were presented. What I don't understand is how the option for ArriveCAN that was ultimately chosen could have been presented if there was no bid from GC Strategies. Did you look at the two options presented to Minh Doan and John Ossowski to see if there were companies attached to them? Did you examine how the option for ArriveCAN was chosen if there was no bid submitted? Who created the option for ArriveCAN that led to GC Strategies?
I recognize there are a number of questions there, so I can repeat them if needed, once you start answering.