Yes, that's right. Pardon me.
One of the issues that I have here is that even in the motion, in the preamble, there are sentences here that state things as a matter of fact that are still being analyzed as we speak. I turn your attention specifically, for example, in the motion, to part (iii), that states,
That the Committee report to the House that, given that,
(iii) The Government of Canada has $250 million in contracts with GC Strategies listed on its website,
If we were to agree to that number we would be agreeing to that as established fact, which it's not at this point. We're still trying to figure out the number of contracts that the Government of Canada has entered into with GC Strategies. We've seen correspondence that states that some double counting may have occurred. We want to be sure that number is correct. At the same time, we know that we want to go further than just GC Strategies. We know GC Strategies was established in 2015. However, we know that the principals of that company were actually entering into contracts with the Government of Canada long before 2015.
One of the things that we asked for on the Liberal side is that we expand the scope of what we're interested in looking at.