That's fair enough.
We have a situation in which an investigation is under review. You have concerns about sharing your evidence to ensure that the truth is made and that we get to the bottom of it, and we all agree with that. I believe the investigation is also looking, for that matter, and the RCMP is making its investigations. I don't know to what extent that's happened, because that's part of the integrity of the investigation.
Certainly when we're dealing with this now in public and individuals are having conversations with you on the side and we're here before this committee, we're prejudicing the possibility of a proper outcome, in my opinion.
Notwithstanding, I don't want to discuss the actual details of the preliminary statement of facts, because that's where we're trying to protect you as well, in that circumstance.
You mentioned that one of the members.... Well, he's not a full-time member of the committee; he's part time. He comes in and he's reached out to you. When did that first happen? When were you first approached by a committee member?