You have repeatedly expressed concern about the Auditor General's findings. You've expressed a lack of belief in the preliminary statement of facts from the internal investigation and you have trouble with the Botler report, yet the RCMP seems to think, based on what they've been given, that there is a basis for an investigation.
I'm trying to understand these two perspectives. One is that there's nothing to see here, and the other is that there's lots to see here and that it's very important and that we need to get to the bottom of this.
How should the public understand that discrepancy?