I appreciate the attempt to find a compromise. It's difficult to know where to land on this, because, of course, we don't know how many documents we're talking about. Perhaps previous document orders have given people a sense of the volume that we're talking about, but I think we want it to be realistic in terms of the timeline and to get the answers the committee deserves and the public deserves.
My instinct would be to keep it broad, as Mrs. Vignola outlined in her original motion. I have no idea about the practicality or practicability of that, so I'm hesitant to support trimming it down without knowing whether that's necessary. How many emails can you send about a topic like that? It's hard to say.