I actually think the Auditor General at PACP yesterday.... The deputy auditor general suggested that it would be helpful to share the email trail to be able to demonstrate.
Let's just walk through what it looked like. The CBSA approached the procurement authority and asked to have a sole-source contract or a non-competitive contract that was multi-year. The officer pushed back and said that it would not be within the frame of an emergency, the pandemic, so that was reduced to one year and the cost was substantially reduced.
The second thing was that the per diems were renegotiated downwards to be able to be more competitive and in line with what we saw in that category.
The third thing was that there was a pretty thorough challenge on the sole-source justification the CBSA provided, indicating that it had a compelling need for this. When the CBSA came back, we asked it to demonstrate the compelling need. We also shared it with our legal counsel to ensure that it really met that threshold.
In the end, it's their decision and their compelling argument was to keep the border open.