No, sir. The CBSA said that GC Strategies provided a proposal. The Auditor General confirmed that it did not.
The question is very simple: Why is the CBSA actively misleading the Auditor General in the performance of her role?
It really brings to mind the cosy relationship that GC Strategies had with the CBSA.
The second case in point is that there was a reference to a $25-million sole-sourced contract going to GC Strategies, and the CBSA invited GC Strategies to write their own contract. If that's not showing favouritism to GC Strategies, I don't know what is.
What was going on at the CBSA that allowed these highly irregular and suspicious contracting practices with Kristian Firth and Darren Anthony of GC Strategies?