I know that French and English interpretation is a factor to take into consideration, but you are hesitating. You are avoiding saying the names of these two companies, which are not mentioned in the letter.
We now know, following Mr. Leahy's revelations, that this presentation was given by both companies, which work together without necessarily being connected by contracts or shareholders. This is the first time, then, in this letter, that any mention is made of allowing these companies to bypass the normal procurement process.
This is the first time that GC Strategies is involved in the file.
Is that correct?