Okay.
I take issue with your net analysis. I think it's incomplete, and I think it looks at only one side of the ledger. When we look just at the fuel charge impacts directly, which you speak about as well, you talk about eight out of 10 households being better off. Can you speak to that a bit? Looking just at the impact of the fuel charge as compared to the Canada carbon rebate, you mentioned that eight out of 10 families are better off. Can you speak to just the fuel charge, not the net analysis?