Evidence of meeting #117 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was communities.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jan Simpson  National President, Canadian Union of Postal Workers
Dwayne Jones  National President, Canadian Postmasters and Assistants Association

11:05 a.m.

NDP

Taylor Bachrach NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

I don't think this is a point of order.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Gentlemen—

11:05 a.m.

NDP

Taylor Bachrach NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

It's an abuse of the process—

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Mr. Bachrach, I have the floor. I understand.

Could we have silence?

Mrs. Kusie, can you get to your point of order, please?

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Stephanie Kusie Conservative Calgary Midnapore, AB

Yes, of course.

He went on to create the failed, scandal-plagued Canada Infrastructure Bank.

The greatest stain on our society currently, I believe, Mr. Chair, is his role and McKinsey's role in the opioid crisis. They had to pay $600 million in damages—

11:05 a.m.

Liberal

Irek Kusmierczyk Liberal Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

Is this “clips Monday”?

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Stephanie Kusie Conservative Calgary Midnapore, AB

I think, given this report—

11:05 a.m.

Liberal

Charles Sousa Liberal Mississauga—Lakeshore, ON

Seriously. You would do it to us. Do it to her, please.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Stephanie Kusie Conservative Calgary Midnapore, AB

—by the procurement ombudsman today, Mr. Chair, it is absolutely necessary for this committee to hear from the procurement ombudsman—

11:05 a.m.

Liberal

Charles Sousa Liberal Mississauga—Lakeshore, ON

Mr. Chair, please....

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Stephanie Kusie Conservative Calgary Midnapore, AB

—regarding this report, and from the CBSA once again.

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Gentlemen, please—

11:05 a.m.

NDP

Taylor Bachrach NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Mr. Chair, may I raise a point of order?

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Yes. Is it on that point of order or a different point of order?

11:05 a.m.

NDP

Taylor Bachrach NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

I'm just wondering what your ruling will be on the point of order raised by my colleague Mrs. Kusie.

11:10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

If I could get to it, I could probably make such a ruling.

Mrs. Kusie, I appreciate your comments. This is not a point of order.

Colleagues, if you have read the report, though, it is pretty—

11:10 a.m.

Liberal

Majid Jowhari Liberal Richmond Hill, ON

We agree, but that doesn't have—

11:10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

I'm glad you agree. It's a....

Let me speak, please.

It is a rather damning report.

I appreciate Mrs. Kusie's comments, though it is not a point of order.

I'm glad you agree. Perhaps we've had the ombudsman in before—

11:10 a.m.

Liberal

Majid Jowhari Liberal Richmond Hill, ON

No, I do agree, but that's not—

11:10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Okay. My Liberal colleagues agree with me.

11:10 a.m.

Liberal

Majid Jowhari Liberal Richmond Hill, ON

—a point of order.

11:10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

No.

I hope that we will agree and we can get to having Mr. Jeglic in, and perhaps PSPC, on the report he's spent the past year preparing. I hope if everyone's fine with that, we'll find some time to do it.

11:10 a.m.

Liberal

Majid Jowhari Liberal Richmond Hill, ON

I guess we're still on the same point of order, Mr. Chair.

11:10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Go ahead, Mr. Bachrach, if you have anything else.

11:10 a.m.

NDP

Taylor Bachrach NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

I share my colleague's concern about the report, and I very much want to see this committee examine that in great detail.

My concern is that points of order are used inappropriately and the chair doesn't cut them off. I don't think that's a latitude you would allow me or anyone from another party, so I would just ask that in the future, points of order be restricted to actual points of order.

I think all parties are guilty of that at different times, but it's frustrating and it's a frustrating way to start an important meeting. I'll just leave it at that.

Thank you.