I'll just situate the question.
It comes from the national master standing offer. There were three documents that were ultimately required as part of the call-up process, and none of them was a statement of work from the department. It was a proposal from the proponent, which in this situation was McKinsey, that ultimately drove the call-up process. Without the lack of a definitized statement of work, it's very difficult to say that the performance is either lacking or has been delivered. In those circumstances, ultimately the government is being led by the supplier, and the supplier provides the proposal, including the pricing, without the grounding of a statement of work, and that's why we found it so concerning.