The genesis for our review always looks at the practices of departments, so we're not typically looking to name individuals, but I think that recently we have started looking more closely at the names of individuals, departments, programs, etc. to see if we can see trends at that level as well. Here we did not see political influence, and we also didn't see many repetitive actors.
Obviously, in the formation of the national master standing offer, PSPC was the contracting authority in all of the call-ups, so there was a unified kind of analysis done by one group within PSPC for that national master standing offer. If you ask for community, that's one community of people that I would identify.