Obviously, I could not comment on why other jurisdictions would be contracting with a specific supplier, but we did see examples in the documentation that it has a good reputation. That good reputation is ultimately what leads the starting point of the conversation.
One clarification I need to make, though, is that we're not reviewing the practices of McKinsey. We're reviewing the practices of the departments that ultimately contracted with McKinsey. I think it is an important distinction.
Where we talk about favouritism, it's favouritism on the part of department actions, not on the part of McKinsey.