I can't definitively answer yes or no to the question because the fact set is a little bit more complicated than what's portrayed here.
Essentially, we made a negative inference in this specific circumstance because this specific file had documentation at all steps of the process except for the point in time that this is identified, which was where the decision of the evaluation committee was sent to the contracting authority. The contracting authority performed the financial evaluations. The results of the financial evaluations were then made known to all the evaluators.
It was at this point in time that one of the evaluators saw who the ultimate winning proposal should be. At that point in time, there's no further documentation as to what happened. Ultimately, it was indicated by that specific evaluator that there had been an error in the assessment of one of the criteria associated as part of the technical evaluation.