Thank you, Mr. Chair.
It's shocking to hear, yet again, a repeat of what we went through only a few months ago when we were talking about the sensitivity, competitive nature and proprietary information at hand, in terms of releasing some of this information. The member opposite just admitted to having reviewed one of the contracts, notwithstanding the duty of confidentiality he's obliged to. He's yapping on about stuff that's not in the contract, inferring what should be in the contract.
Recognizing, of course, that there are other competitors in play and other matters of confidentiality—