Sure, and your threshold is the lowest rung of the ladder, ultimately, until you get a conviction.
There's suspicion. Then there's reasonable and probable grounds by a police service. Then there's proof beyond a reasonable doubt by Crown attorneys and ultimately a conviction. A suspicion is a very low threshold.
I'm looking at literally the same sort of criminal charges as it relates to McKinsey as the Government of Canada Strategies, where the RCMP have confirmed they raided his house a couple of weeks ago. They're looking at two counts: fraud under section 380 of the Criminal Code and forgery under section 267 of the Criminal Code.
I know that you may not be comfortable in answering this question, but I'm going to put it to you in any event. Do you feel, given your review of McKinsey and the irregularities and the strong presumption against a favouritism towards McKinsey over any other contractor, that there is an element of fraud in relation to the Government of Canada? Yes or no, sir.