I would note that when you look at the universe of contracts that were reviewed in this review, there were 32. Of those, 19 were part of the national master standing offer, so it's a very different set of documentation requirements that we're discussing. The remaining ones—not all of them, but the vast majority—were of low contract value, under $40,000. I think as the paperwork went back and forth, there was probably not enough hygiene and rigour around making sure that it was well collated.
Another issue when it comes to documentation, and some of the frustration, perhaps, of the committee, or that I feel from the committee, is that when you do an evaluation of a bid, half of the bid documentation goes to a department that does the technical evaluation. There's a whole bunch of bid methodology material prepared there. PSPC keeps the financial envelopes. They're kind of independent keys. Then we have to put the file back together and make sure the documentation is well described.
I don't know if you have anything else.