There's not much more to be said except that I don't think that's acceptable. We'll wait for your written response, but the House passed the motion, prescribed a timeline asking for the money to asked for, and we're well past that timeline. We're hearing that essentially it's in the process of being studied. That's clearly not good enough, but we'll look for a response. Fundamentally, this is on the government for setting those expectations.
You were a bit ambiguous in your response on the particular aspect of favouritism in the McKinsey report from the ombudsman. The ombudsman found that favouritism was shown towards McKinsey. You seemed to say that you agreed with the findings of the report yet also you seemed not to be clear on whether you agree with the finding of favouritism.
Did the government show favouritism toward McKinsey?