All of these announcements are political, one way or another. You can't remove politics from this. Given that the government is late—it was supposed to announce this in November, and now we're several months after that—it probably simply was a question of timing.
I don't think it would hurt that the timing also relates to, as Mr. Kasurak said, the events going on in the Russo-Ukrainian war and with NATO. It became a much more politically hot topic. I think for the government, in terms of the Prime Minister and the ministers meeting with NATO officials, this was a central issue for the officials—not the decision, but that Canada needed to do something—and we committed to doing something. I think that's where you get the timing of all this.
Just quickly, about Finland, I don't know if Finland's decision is about waiting for the block IV, or if the Finland decision is about its projected spending on the acquisition. It could be simply the latter: This is when we are ready to buy it.
In terms of upgrade costs, the whole system is designed in these blocks that you are able to constantly upgrade. Now, I don't know in the estimates of life cycles of the F-35—regardless of whether it's III, IV or V—how much that's been plugged in, but that should be part of those long-term estimates.