It's a great question, sir.
I think it's about defining what you mean by “better”. Often, when I think about who's doing well in procurement, it's really about project by project.
The one thing I'll give the Danes and Finns credit for—and the Swiss as well—is their ability to make a decision. This idea that we take the better part of 15 or 16 years to actually get a decision.... Kudos to those countries for having a much more condensed process, relative to ours, of just a few years. That's really about political prioritization. You can kind of look into how the defence procurement process is structured.
In that case, I think your question points to where there are examples of specific projects of equal complexity that are done right. In those particular examples, it's that those countries had a much tighter timeline just in terms of making a decision on when to buy aircraft.