Mr. Chair, I would like to comment on that, if I could.
It's difficult to quantify what Canada is actually receiving, although it's probably clearer than the alternative. It should be kept in mind that industrial benefits, whatever they're called today, were very difficult to track. You couldn't tell whether it was going to be money that would have been spent anyway. A lot of it couldn't be adequately costed. No matter which system you use, the number you're going to end up with is going to be fairly soft.
This approach at least means that Canadian firms have to be competitive and commercially viable to get contracts, so we know we're supporting the right people. The alternative has to be kept in mind, as well as whether this approach is actually working.