Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'll ask Mr. Girard a question about regulatory capture and how to avoid it in the setting of standards.
One of the criticisms we hear—and we've had these conversations recently with members of the labour community—is that regulations get drawn up in close consultation with what government sees as being the key stakeholders, which is often the industry that is being regulated. They see them as being the key stakeholders because there's an entire industry around lobbying government, as anyone who works on the Hill knows.
Often the public, who are the beneficiaries of regulation, are left out of that initial conversation, and unions often feel the same. They're brought in to consult on something that has essentially been written without them.
How do we avoid that, both in the regulatory process and in the standards process you were talking about?