Thank you, Minister. I think it's clearly on the record what was asked and what was answered.
We're here reviewing indigenous contracting as well. Documents have been received that reveal that a small number of nominally indigenous firms were able to act as brokers between the federal government and other potentially non-indigenous companies by simply getting contracts and subcontracting. This allows the contracts to fit into an indigenous contracting quota, even though indigenous people do not actually benefit because the subcontractors may be all or mostly non-indigenous.
These companies are essentially using the Dalian or GC Strategies model.
I want to ask you, when a company gets a contract under an indigenous set-aside, is there an expectation or a requirement that some percentage of subcontracts also go to indigenous firms?